aquapurple
☆    

Bangalore,
2012-10-01 15:02
(5018 d 02:59 ago)

Posting: # 9287
Views: 5,356
 

 rounding of 95% CL [RSABE / ABEL]

Dear All,

I have a doubt regarding the new guideline of FDA.

The guideline says that 95% upper confidence bound should be less than or equal to zero. Is there any chance that the 95% upper confidence bound will be equal to zero? How many decimal places should we keep for the same?


Edit: Category and subject line changed. [Helmut]

Regards,
Nee…
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2012-10-01 16:06
(5018 d 01:55 ago)

@ aquapurple
Posting: # 9288
Views: 4,435
 

 rounding or not?

Hi Nee!

❝ The guideline says that 95% upper confidence bound should be less than or equal to zero. Is there any chance that the 95% upper confidence bound will be equal to zero?


Yes, although very, very small.

❝ How many decimal places should we keep for the same?


Good question! I guess most people calculate the CL in full precision and set up their software in such a way that a verbatim statement is printed. At least this is what I do. On the other hand FDA's SAS code for unscaled ABE does not include a rounding statement – which is required according to the [image] 2003 guidance. Since inclusion of the 90% CI requires rounding to two decimal places (i.e., four significant digits if <100% and five significant digits if ≥100%) rounding of the upper 95% CL to five significant digits may be an option. Interested in other opinions.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
d_labes
★★★

Berlin, Germany,
2012-10-01 18:42
(5017 d 23:19 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 9289
Views: 4,314
 

 significant digits or not?

Dear Helmut!

❝ ❝ How many decimal places should we keep for the same?


❝ Good question!

❝ ... rounding of the upper 95% CL to five significant digits may be an option. Interested in other opinions.


I bet: If you report upper 95% CL = -1.0459E-94 (5 significant digits :-D) you will be asked in a deficiency letter to comment.

Regards,

Detlew
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2012-10-01 18:55
(5017 d 23:07 ago)

@ d_labes
Posting: # 9290
Views: 4,336
 

 significant digits or not?

Dear Detlew!

❝ I bet: If you report upper 95% CL = -1.0459E-94 (5 significant digits :-D) you will be asked in a deficiency letter to comment.


Good point. Do you expect the chance to get a deficiency letter after rounding to five decimal places (upper 95% CL = 0.00000) to be lower? :-D

As Nee asked in his original post:

❝ Is there any chance that the 95% upper confidence bound will be equal to zero?


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
344 visitors (0 registered, 344 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5