Achievwin
★★  

US,
2026-03-24 17:11
(71 d 07:22 ago)

Posting: # 24597
Views: 1,779
 

 appropriate test for comparing Time values [General Sta­tis­tics]

What is appropriate statistical test for Comparing Time variables in a BE or RBA study? Time variables usually we report Median and (Min-Max) as opposed to Mean+/- SD?

What is the most accepted and appropriate statistical test comparing Median and Range values?

Thanks,
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2026-03-25 14:01
(70 d 10:32 ago)

@ Achievwin
Posting: # 24598
Views: 1,319
 

 Comparing Time values: How? Duno.

Hi Achievwin,

I reordered you questions.

❝ Time variables usually we report Median and (Min-Max) as opposed to Mean+/- SD?

Yep, because due to the chosen sampling scheme the observed values are discrete. The mean implies an underlying normal distribution, which would be wrong.

❝ What is appropriate statistical test for Comparing Time variables in a BE or RBA study?

IMHO, a nonparametric test of untransformed data (differences). If – and only if‼ – clinically relevant, 90% CI within pre-specified limits. Likely asymmetrical, e.g., not ±30 min but {–20 min, + 45 min}.

❝ What is the most accepted and appropriate statistical test comparing Median and Range values?

The range does not make sense. No idea what is “most accepted and appropriate”. See this article for some desultory thoughts.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2026-03-26 13:35
(69 d 10:58 ago)

@ Achievwin
Posting: # 24600
Views: 1,332
 

 appropriate test for comparing Time values

Hi Achiewin,


I second what Helmut said. We don't know much about the distribution of e.g. Tmax (or Tmax difference) so it can be argued that whatever test you apply, it has to be non-parametric.
Most stats packages allow a Wilcoxon (rank-based) test optionally garnished with a CI of sorts.
This gives you a p-value. There is some controversy, re. the null hypothesis that the p-value corresponds to and how p should be derived. An added complexity is that in BE we often have paired designs, and we often (I'd think almost always) have subjects with identical values for the metric being compared (like 6 subjects has Tmax of 2 hrs in one group, and 8 subjects had Tmax of 2 hrs in the other group) and such cases may further complicate the derivation of p.

So, the very simple question of "how do I compare?" quickly spirals into something that has no simple answer. If you are in a situation where you have to send in "something" along the lines of a comparison of something like Tmax etc, then I think it is ok to simply submit what your stats package offers in its most simple form with a clear description of what exactly it is you are doing. Notably be clear if you present data for the median difference or the location of the median of your metric.
If the regulators don't happen to like what you give them, they must tell so and ask for something else. Their request will usually give a decent hint as to what exactly they are then looking for.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Achievwin
★★  

US,
2026-03-26 16:26
(69 d 08:07 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 24601
Views: 1,360
 

 appropriate test for comparing Time values

Thank you both

I found that "Mann Whitney U test" and "Mood’s median test" as appropriate, can you advise which one of these tests is more appropriate? Or none of these are right tests?

https://rcompanion.org/handbook/F_09.html#:~:text=Mood's%20median%20test%20compares%20the,function%20in%20the%20coin%20package

Regards,

AchievWin.
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2026-03-26 23:02
(69 d 01:31 ago)

@ Achievwin
Posting: # 24602
Views: 1,287
 

 appropriate test for comparing Time values

Hi Achievwin

❝ I found that "Mann Whitney U test" and "Mood’s median test" as appropriate, can you advise which one of these tests is more appropriate? Or none of these are right tests?


Sounds good.
The Mann-Whitney U test is one of the Wilcoxon tests. There are two of them that I know of:
Wilcoxon Signed Rank test (used for paired observations)
Wilcoxon Rank Sum test (unpaired observations; this is the Mann-Whitney U test)

Even so, there seems to be a little bit of disagreement about the nomenclature and definitions, see e.g. R's help file for the Wilcoxon test.

What kind of data do you have (is your study crossover or parallel)?
I would need to read some books that go a little beyond Wikipedia :-) to figure out how/when/if Mood's test provides something more relevant than Wilcoxon variants.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
459 visitors (0 registered, 459 guests [including 44 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are in fact two things, science and opinion;
the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance.    Hippocrates

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5