Dafni_C
☆    

Cyprus,
2024-01-17 11:00
(869 d 10:30 ago)

Posting: # 23829
Views: 5,836
 

 Subject effect justification [General Sta­tis­tics]

We have performed a bioequivalence study which passed the acceptance criteria. However there is a subject (sequence) effect for for ln-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞. How this can be justified that doesn't affect the study results?:confused::confused:
Relaxation
★    

Germany,
2024-01-17 13:30
(869 d 08:00 ago)

@ Dafni_C
Posting: # 23831
Views: 4,515
 

 Subject effect justification

Dear Dafni_C.

Just for clarification of the background.
You conducted an ANOVA (or mixed effects model) with the effects "treatment", "sequence" and "period" as well as the effect "subject(sequence)"?
And in your "ANOVA"-table the p-value of "subject(sequence)" was found to be statistically significant?

There are more qualified persons here, but ...
this indicates that the subjects in the trial were different people, so that normally would be expected to be "significant", right?

If you mean the "sequence" effect or something else, you may find the information available in the "Articles" (see header at the very top) helpful.

Best regards!
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
403 visitors (0 registered, 403 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5