VijithRoy
☆    

India,
2021-03-03 09:35
(1528 d 22:14 ago)

Posting: # 22239
Views: 3,821
 

 Confidence interval for PK and PD analysis [General Sta­tis­tics]

Hello everyone,

Why do we set 95% CI for PD data analysis and 90% CI for PK analysis.? Why not 90% CI for PD data analysis?

Please kindly clarify me and correct me if am wrong anywhere.


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

With Best Regards,
Vroy.
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2021-03-03 12:15
(1528 d 19:34 ago)

@ VijithRoy
Posting: # 22240
Views: 2,973
 

 Confidence interval for PK and PD analysis

Hello VijithRoy,

❝ Why do we set 95% CI for PD data analysis and 90% CI for PK analysis.? Why not 90% CI for PD data analysis?


can you please be much more specific?
There are lots of 90% CI's used in PD, so in order to get towards an answer for your question can you please give a lot more context including: Where do you submit the dossier, what drug is it, what is your endpoint, did you get sc.advice or do a controlled correspondence with the authority etc?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
VijithRoy
☆    

India,
2021-03-04 11:03
(1527 d 20:46 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 22241
Views: 2,904
 

 Confidence interval for PK and PD analysis

❝ There are lots of 90% CI's used in PD, so in order to get towards an answer for your question can you please give a lot more context including: Where do you submit the dossier, what drug is it, what is your endpoint, did you get sc.advice or do a controlled correspondence with the authority etc?


Dear ElMaestro,

I was assuming that 95% CI uses for PD and 90% CI for PK analysis.
So setting up the CI depends upon our Statistical Modeling?


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

With Best Regards,
Vroy.
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
130 visitors (0 registered, 130 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We should not speak so that it is possible
for the audience to understand us,
but so that it is impossible
for them to misunderstand us.    Quintilian

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5