|
sudy ☆ India, 2017-08-01 15:29 (3229 d 01:53 ago) Posting: # 17641 Views: 6,958 |
|
|
Hi all, Can anyone suggest any logic on below results? ![]() Why Inter subject CV is not calculated for Cmax? Is this formula is correct to calculate between subject variability on log transformed data for two way cross over study? If i calculate manually in excel, I am getting the value around 28% for cmax. But SAS gives error. One more point i have noted that, the MSS is very low by SAS, but manually this value is very high. Why R-square is very low for Cmax? Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. [Helmut] |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2017-08-01 16:33 (3229 d 00:49 ago) @ sudy Posting: # 17642 Views: 5,797 |
|
|
Hi sudy, next time you upload a PNG please 640px (longest side) or better only the numbers. I had a hard time to read the results. ![]() ❝ Why Inter subject CV is not calculated for Cmax? Unless you want to deal with imaginary numbers, the square root of a negative value is not defined. Since ℯ(MSs – MSe)/2 = 0.994155, √–0.005845 don’t work. ❝ Is this formula is correct to calculate between subject variability on log transformed data for two way cross over study? Yes. See there. ❝ If i calculate manually in excel, I am getting the value around 28% for cmax. But SAS gives error. Please check what you have done in Excel. Cannot work:
100*SQRT((EXP(B1)-1)).❝ One more point i have noted that, the MSS is very low by SAS, but manually this value is very high. No idea. I don’t have a crystal ball which could tell me what you are doing “manually”. ❝ Why R-square is very low for Cmax? Higher variability than the ones of AUCs ⇒ lower R2. As expected. — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
![[image]](img/uploaded/image463.png)


![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
