cakhatri
★    

India,
2012-09-08 08:31
(4629 d 05:36 ago)

Posting: # 9163
Views: 5,695
 

 Ambulatory samples collection [Study Per­for­mance]

Dear members,

For collection of ambulatory samples we have in-house limits of ± 2 hrs from the scheduled time. If the scheduled time is 8.00 hrs, a volunteer can give his sample upto 10:00hrs and can be accepted as per protocol.

The question is, how long the ambulatory sample can be collected beyond the allowed deviation of 2 hrs.

Regards
Chirag
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2012-09-08 15:24
(4628 d 22:42 ago)

@ cakhatri
Posting: # 9165
Views: 4,813
 

 Deviations from scheduled sampling times

Dear Chirag!

❝ For collection of ambulatory samples we have in-house limits of ± 2 hrs from the scheduled time.


Most CROs allow for flexible deviations based on the sampling interval; 5% of the shorter of the two time intervals surrounding the sample are suggested.* Example:
scheduled interval shorter  5%   h:mm
   16        8                       
   24       12         8    0.4  0:24
   36       12        12    0.6  0:36
   48       24        12    0.6  0:36
   72       48        24    1.2  0:72
  120       48                       

For the last sample I would allow 5% of the last interval = 0:72. ±5% doesn’t make sense, IMHO. A subject may arrive late (positive deviation), but it should be pointed out in the ICF that if somebody shows up early he/she has to await the scheduled time point (see also the quote in this post). Generally I’m in favour of the lin-up/log-down trapezoidal rule for the calculation of AUC because the linear trapezoidal rule gives a positive bias in the elimination phase.

❝ The question is, how long the ambulatory sample can be collected beyond the allowed deviation of 2 hrs.


Tricky question. I would not send the subject home without taking a sample. :-D State in the protocol what you would do in such a case. For AUC it shouldn’t be much of a problem. For AUC72 you might consider using an estimated [image]72 (given you have a reliable estimate of λz). With your current pro­ce­dure you might end up comparing AUC70 to AUC74; a case of apples-and-oranges statistics.
If you are concerned about the regulatory acceptance of the data due to a large deviation, you may exclude the subject from the assessment of AUC, but still keep the data of Cmax (which is likely more variable and therefore more important).


  • G Pabst
    Deviations in sampling times (Chapter 5.5)
    in: W Cawello (ed), Parameters for Compartment-free Pharmacokinetics – Standardisation of Study Design, Data Analysis and Reporting
    Shaker Verlag, Aachen 2003, pp 78–79
    ISBN 3-8265-4767-5

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
cakhatri
★    

India,
2012-09-11 08:20
(4626 d 05:46 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 9171
Views: 4,585
 

 Deviations from scheduled sampling times

Dear Helmut,
Thanks for the clarifications and suggestions
Regards
Chirag
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
157 visitors (0 registered, 157 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5