janmacek ☆ Czech Republic, 2010-08-27 11:35 (5372 d 13:42 ago) Posting: # 5849 Views: 6,671 |
|
Dear all, the new BE guideline recommends the use of labels with a tear-off portion on the individually packed test and reference products. Could you kindly explain me what information should be printed on this tear-off portion and what is the purpose of it? How do you archive these tear-off labels? And more generally, how do you pack the products individually for each subject? If they come from the sponsor packed in blisters, do you divide the blister with scissors to single units and put them into an envelope with an appropriate label? Or do you put the tablets from the blisters to a bottle? Thank you. With best regards, Jan |
Ohlbe ★★★ France, 2010-08-27 12:22 (5372 d 12:56 ago) @ janmacek Posting: # 5850 Views: 5,540 |
|
Dear Jan, ❝ the new BE guideline recommends the use of labels with a tear-off portion The "old" guideline recommended it too... ❝ what information should be printed on this tear-off portion and what is the purpose of it? The purpose of the label is to document that each subject received the product that had been packaged for him and to ensure there is no doubt in each period whether the subject got the test product or the reference product. I would say the following would be the minimum information:
❝ How do you archive these tear-off labels? The idea is to stick it on the CRF when you administer the product to the subject, in real time. ❝ And more generally, how do you pack the products individually for each subject? If they come from the sponsor packed in blisters, do you divide the blister with scissors to single units and put them into an envelope with an appropriate label? Or do you put the tablets from the blisters to a bottle? I would suggest to keep it in the blister, divide the blister with scissors and put the single units into envelopes, bottles, containers or whatever you usually use. Have a look at the Q&A published by EMA's GCP inspectors group, particularly regarding documentation requirements. Regards Ohlbe — Regards Ohlbe |
Dr_Dan ★★ Germany, 2010-08-27 13:58 (5372 d 11:19 ago) @ Ohlbe Posting: # 5851 Views: 5,615 |
|
Dear Ohlbe ❝ I would suggest to keep it in the blister, divide the blister with scissors and put the single units into envelopes, bottles, containers or whatever you usually use. Kind regards Dan — Kind regards and have a nice day Dr_Dan |
janmacek ☆ Czech Republic, 2010-08-27 15:29 (5372 d 09:48 ago) @ Dr_Dan Posting: # 5853 Views: 5,523 |
|
Dear Dan, dividing the blister with scissors is hopefully not a manufacturing process. And the requirement of a GMP certificate for this simple process would be an exaggeration. As a patient, I am always carrying two tablets of my medicine in my wallet, and I am perfectly able to cut the blister without the GMP certificate! Of course, the packaging and administration must be performed according an SOP and should be documented, there is no discussion about it. With best regards, Jan |
Ohlbe ★★★ France, 2010-08-27 16:27 (5372 d 08:51 ago) @ Dr_Dan Posting: # 5858 Views: 5,518 |
|
Dear Dan, ❝ In practice you need GMP certificate (because it is a manufacturing process) and you can perform this only in GMP-certified rooms Except if you can benefit from the exception in Commission Directive 2005/28/EC, Article 9 (2). It depends of course how these provisions were transcribed in the German legislation (well, actually I wouldn't be that surprised if AMG were a bit rigid...) ❝ by qualified staff teached to respective SOPs etc. Agreed (whether the product is left in the blister or not). ❝ In summary it is not as easy as you told. I never said it's easy ![]() Regards Ohlbe — Regards Ohlbe |
Pavidus ● 2010-08-27 15:17 (5372 d 10:01 ago) @ janmacek Posting: # 5852 Views: 5,546 |
|
Dear Jan, cave scissors! We always ask the sponsor to pack the IMPs individually (for each subject, for each period according to the RND list). By using scissors for dividing the blister you eliminate the rationale for the tear-off label. One subject - one blister. As Dr. Dan wrote - by any kind of manipulation with the IMPs you would need a GMP certificate. |
Ohlbe ★★★ France, 2010-08-27 16:18 (5372 d 09:00 ago) @ Pavidus Posting: # 5856 Views: 5,516 |
|
Dear Pavidus, ❝ By using scissors for dividing the blister you eliminate the rationale for the tear-off label. One subject - one blister. I would not say so. I suggested to keep the tablet in the blister because of stability considerations (you don't have stability data on the tablet out of its protective blister). The tear-off label is rather an easy way to document what you have given to the subject. Regards Ohlbe — Regards Ohlbe |