Aceto81
★    

Belgium,
2009-01-13 11:34
(6369 d 17:14 ago)

Posting: # 3022
Views: 6,558
 

 Product not comparable [Study Per­for­mance]

Hello,

during a comparative study between our product and a product already on the market, we found residues in the kidneys for about 150 days in our product, but only 30 days for the concurent.

As we thougth that our product was fairly compareble with the concurents, it doesn't need any imagination to find that we were surprised. But now we are wondering what is going on?

Is this due to a delayed absorption, or what else can cause this effect?

Any insights in this would be welcome (or any tests to get some more insights)


Thanks

Ace
ElMaestro
★★★

Denmark,
2009-01-13 16:14
(6369 d 12:34 ago)

@ Aceto81
Posting: # 3026
Views: 4,984
 

 Product not comparable

Hi Aceto81,

that really sounds odd.
I have no good explanation, but have you considered publishing the data - if I get you right the products appear BE but are not behaving similarly in the body?

EM.
Aceto81
★    

Belgium,
2009-01-13 23:12
(6369 d 05:37 ago)

@ ElMaestro
Posting: # 3028
Views: 4,957
 

 Product not comparable

Hi EM,

some hours after posting my message, viewing your message and some brainstorming, we figured out that we didn't get the whole story!
Seems like there is no BE data available at all, and even the posologies are different!

So I do apologize for taking your time

All the best
Ace
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
122 visitors (0 registered, 122 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5