yes_naresh ☆ 2009-12-28 06:44 (5595 d 09:11 ago) Posting: # 4529 Views: 7,993 |
|
Dear All, I have to perform Steady state analysis in WinNonlin, but I am not sure about the method which I supposed to be used will give correct results or not, If any one can provide data with results then I can crosscheck with my method. Thanks and Regards Naresh Edit: Category and subject line changed. [Helmut] |
Helmut ★★★ ![]() ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2009-12-30 15:45 (5593 d 00:10 ago) @ yes_naresh Posting: # 4539 Views: 7,984 |
|
Dear Naresh! ❝ I have to perform Steady state analysis in WinNonlin, but I am not sure ❝ about the method which I supposed to be used will give correct results or ❝ not, Any specific questions? Which version of WinNonlin are you using (WinNonlin 5.x, Phoenix 6.x)? I guess you have read the User's Guide (WNL v5.2.1 page 172, Phoenix 6.0 page 280, Phoenix 6.1 page 277). ❝ If any one can provide data with results then I can crosscheck with my ❝ method. Critical are only time deviations of samples scheduled at t=tau. WinNonlin estimates AUC_TAU based on lambda_z; therefore if the last sampling time point deviates from tau you should get an AUC_TAU # AUClast. Open WinNonlin's 'Exp1.pwo': in 'Dosing Regimen' check ☑ 'Steady state', Dose 1, Time of Last Dose 0, Tau 24 in 'Model Options' > 'NCA Settings' > 'Calculation Method' > Linear Trapezoidal (Linear/Log Interpolation) You should get Lambda_z 0.0646 (AUCtau=AUClast, because tlast=tau)Change the last time point in 'Exp1.pwo' from 24 h to 23.5 h > in 'NCA Workbook' > right click > Refresh Lambda_z 0.0677 (AUCtau>AUClast, because tlast<tau)Change the last time point in 'Exp1.pwo' from 24 h to 24.5 h > in'NCA Workbook' > right click > Refresh Lambda_z 0.0596 (AUCtau<AUClast, because tlast>tau)Does this example answer your question? — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |
yes_naresh ☆ 2010-01-11 09:40 (5581 d 06:15 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 4585 Views: 6,775 |
|
Dear HS, Thanks for your reply; I will get back to you after going through the referred posts. Thanks and Regards, Naresh Shirsath |
yes_naresh ☆ 2010-01-13 13:58 (5579 d 01:58 ago) @ Helmut Posting: # 4593 Views: 6,757 |
|
Dear HS, ❝ Any specific questions? Which version of WinNonlin are you using (WinNonlin 5.x, Phoenix 6.x)? I am using WinNonlin 5.2, ❝ I guess you have read the User's Guide (WNL v5.2.1 page 172, Phoenix 6.0 page 280, Phoenix 6.1 page 277). ❝ in 'Dosing Regimen' check ☑ 'Steady state', Dose 1, Time of Last Dose 0, Tau 24 ❝ in 'Model Options' > 'NCA Settings' > 'Calculation Method' > Linear Trapezoidal (Linear/Log Interpolation) I have read User's Guide (WinNonlin5.2) but not get required answer. Below I have given data of 1st subject of period 1 only. I have used above steps, DATA - Time Point Concentration 'Dosing Regimen' check ☑ 'Steady state', Dose 35, Time of Last Dose 96, Tau 12 in 'Model Options' > 'NCA Settings' > 'Calculation Method' > Linear Trapezoidal (Linear/Log Interpolation) Results I got, Cmin 41.548 Kindly tell me, whether my results are correct or not? Thanks and Regards, Naresh Shirsath |
Helmut ★★★ ![]() ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2010-01-13 16:07 (5578 d 23:48 ago) @ yes_naresh Posting: # 4597 Views: 6,786 |
|
Dear Naresh! ❝ I have read User's Guide (WinNonlin5.2) but not get required answer. Answer to which question? Why didn't you contact Pharsight's support? ❝ Kindly tell me, whether my results are correct or not? Yes, they are. A note for Phoenix-Users: Cmax is not included in the estimation of lambdaz by default (on the contrary to previous versions of WinNonlin), therefore: Lambda_z 0.0953 Just out of curiosity: why did you sample beyond the last dosing interval (108 h)? — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |