sinhmar
☆    

India,
2009-02-11 12:20
(6332 d 07:21 ago)

Posting: # 3221
Views: 5,781
 

 scaled average bioequivalence [Software]

Dear Helmut and D_Labes,

I have read your discussion on SAS and Winnonlin codes and results for scaled average bioequivalence in this discussion and it was very helpful for me.
So in SAS and Winnonlin outputs we are getting variance for both test and reference while we are repeating only reference as per our design.
So my question is how are we getting the variance for Test and can we use that variance of reference for scaling purpose in the study or there is some problem with the SAS codes?

Regards,
Sinhmar
d_labes
★★★

Berlin, Germany,
2009-02-11 13:41
(6332 d 06:00 ago)

@ sinhmar
Posting: # 3223
Views: 4,849
 

 scaled average bioequivalence

Dear Sinhmar,

❝ [...] So in SAS and Winnonlin outputs we are getting variance for both test and reference while we are repeating only reference as per our design.

❝ So my question is how are we getting the variance for Test [...]



At my present knowledge it is not totally clear for me, how SAS (with the SAS code given in the mentioned thread) and WinNonlin are calculating the variance components of the intra-individual variabilities for the test and reference formulations.
My feeling :-D is that there is a problem with the model formulation within both software. An indication for that is that both came out with different values for the model parameters (especially intra- and inter-subject variabilities).

Thus I would go for the moment with the so called "Method of moments" in evaluating scaled ABE. The necessary formulas for estimating the intra-individual variability of the reference and the estimator of the difference between test and reference for the extra-reference design can be found in
R.J. McNally
Tests for Individual and Population Bioequivalence Using 3-Period Crossover Designs
which can be found online here.

This paper deals indeed with individual BE but can puzzled together with the paper of Haidar et.al. to evaluate scaled ABE.

Haidar et.al.
Bioequivalence Approaches for Highly Variable Drugs and Drug Products
Pharmaceutical Research 25/1, 237-241 (2008)
free online resource here

Hope this helps.
See also this thread.

Regards,

Detlew
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
122 visitors (0 registered, 122 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me.    Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5