AngusMcLean
★★  

USA,
2013-05-10 23:36
(4783 d 00:18 ago)

Posting: # 10568
Views: 5,426
 

 Phoenix and Proc. Mixed BE results [Software]

Two programs commonly used for BE calculations include Phoenix from Pharsight and Proc. Mixed (SAS). Equiv test is used and is (I find) most useful, but is limited to a 2-way cross-0ver studies.

Is there any information comparing the BE results obtained for Pharsight's Phoenix and Proc. Mixed for 2 way and 3-way cross over studies.

I believe the FA does not endorse any one program.

Angus


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2013-05-11 00:03
(4782 d 23:52 ago)

@ AngusMcLean
Posting: # 10569
Views: 4,453
 

 Phoenix and Proc. GLM

Hi Angus!

❝ Is there any information comparing the BE results obtained for Pharsight's Phoenix and Proc. Mixed for 2 way and 3-way cross over studies.


You’ll get the same results. Since you have to validate the software anyway simply compare results in Phoenix of data sets from Chow/Liu, Patterson/Jones, and Hauschke/Steinijans/Pigeot with their results – which were obtained in SAS. You only have to be cautious if you want to reproduce Proc GLM in Phoenix. Proc GLM drops incomplete data (i.e., a subject completes only one period), whereas Phoenix always runs REML. Therefore, in Phoenix you have to exclude subjects with incomplete data first.

❝ I believe the FA does not endorse any one program.


Correct. See this thread and some linked references.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
AngusMcLean
★★  

USA,
2013-05-11 06:51
(4782 d 17:03 ago)

@ Helmut
Posting: # 10570
Views: 4,556
 

 Phoenix and Proc. GLM

Helmut: Thank you for your response. Yes; I do have one data set that I ran for BE in WinNonlin some years ago and also ran in a version of SAS (SAS LE).

It is a 3-way X over design with 6 sequences (so it is balanced). I ran it in SAS GLM and WinNonlin. The BE results were exactly the same. No subjects dropped out.

I am looking for such a data set and BE results of an example like above run in SAS Proc Mixed so I can compare with Phoenix Nonlin. I have Chow and Liu's book, but examples are limited. I do not see a Proc-Mixed example. Any idea of where I could find such an example.

Angus


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Helmut]
Helmut
★★★
avatar
Homepage
Vienna, Austria,
2013-05-12 03:58
(4781 d 19:56 ago)

@ AngusMcLean
Posting: # 10573
Views: 4,419
 

 Phoenix and Proc. Mixed

Hi Angus!

❝ I am looking for such a data set and BE results of an example like above run in SAS Proc Mixed so I can compare with Phoenix Nonlin. I have Chow and Liu's book, but examples are limited. I do not see a Proc-Mixed example. Any idea of where I could find such an example.


Maybe this thread helps? Chow/Liu’s 6×3 example, evaluated in SAS Proc Mixed by Detlew and in PHX6.1 by myself.
Another option will be to post your project-file at Pharsight’s Extranet; I’m pretty sure Ana or Linda will be happy to re-run it in SAS.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
116 visitors (0 registered, 116 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me.    Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5