rajucheerla ● 2013-03-26 08:58 (4410 d 06:37 ago) Posting: # 10282 Views: 3,505 |
|
HI all, Does the dose involved in the partial areas calculation (AUCp) while performing the PK analysis of PD markers in Phoenix 6.2, at dosing regimen place, as if we mention dose/or not. As we know the AUC is not a dose dependent variable, but still we got different values when performed with mentioned dose at dosing regimen place in phoenix and with not mentioned dose at dosing regimen in phoenix. ![]() Regards Raju Edit: Subject line and category changed. [Helmut] |
ElMaestro ★★★ Denmark, 2013-04-03 16:26 (4402 d 00:09 ago) @ rajucheerla Posting: # 10334 Views: 2,709 |
|
Hello rajucheerla, ❝ Does the dose involved in the partial areas calculation (AUCp) while performing the PK analysis of PD markers in Phoenix 6.2, at dosing regimen place, as if we mention dose/or not. As we know the AUC is not a dose dependent variable, but still we got different values when performed with mentioned dose at dosing regimen place in phoenix and with not mentioned dose at dosing regimen in phoenix. I must admit I don't understand what you are asking and what your background the question could be. Is there any chance you could re-write your post? — Pass or fail! ElMaestro |
SDavis ★★ ![]() UK, 2013-06-01 00:02 (4343 d 16:32 ago) @ rajucheerla Posting: # 10707 Views: 2,379 |
|
Rajucheerla, If you've still not solved your problem, it would be much clearer to me if you attach a project illustrating the problem. Simon. Edit: Not here – register at Pharsight’s Extranet. [Helmut] — Simon Senior Scientific Trainer, Certara™ [link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX-yCO5Rzag[/link] https://www.certarauniversity.com/dashboard https://support.certara.com/forums/ |