|
shri ☆ 2010-04-06 11:51 (5919 d 04:18 ago) Posting: # 5026 Views: 4,595 |
|
|
Dear all, Please tell me that is it good to take pilot or pivotal data in consideration whose power < 80 and the study was failed, for sample size estimation. Thanks in advance. — shri |
|
Helmut ★★★ ![]() Vienna, Austria, 2010-04-06 20:57 (5918 d 19:11 ago) @ shri Posting: # 5027 Views: 3,877 |
|
|
Dear shri! ❝ Please tell me that is it good... And what if I don't think that it's good? ![]() ❝ ...to take pilot or pivotal data in consideration whose power < 80 and the ❝ study was failed, for sample size estimation. A pilot study can't fail (unless you sc¤ed something up in the design: sampling schedule, bioanalytics) - it's always informative. A posteriori power doesn't exist; see these posts: #419, #1801, #2338, #4596; and yet another interesting (but lengthy) thread. If you want to step into the muddle of a posteriori power calculations - which I don't hope - any 'failed' study will show low power. So what? We know already that our assumptions in study planing did not come out the way we expected ('bad' T/R-ratio, higher CV and/or drop-out rate). For sure you can use the values from a failed pivotal or a pilot in sample size estimation. Keep in mind to adjust for the usual uncertainties (e.g., CVintra from a small pilot). — Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! ![]() Helmut Schütz ![]() The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮 Science Quotes |


![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
