FDA scaling for NTIDs [Design Issues]

posted by krishna – India, 2013-01-18 11:04 (4493 d 04:15 ago) – Posting: # 9889
Views: 7,698

Hi Helmut,

Thanks for your reply.

❝ Hhm, \(\small{\sqrt{0.80\times 0.93}\neq 0.86}\). ;-) If I interpret your example right the study was a full replicate in 32 subjects.


It is 86.25.

❝ The study passes all criteria. What is the problem?


My problem is, here %(T/R): 86.25, it is far way from the 100 and R-R %CV: 26. Due to higher CV it is passing SABE (it would have been failed in SABE if it had low variability). Then how test can be assured with therapeutic equivalence as Reference with out point estimate constraint ?

Thanks,

Krishna.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
195 visitors (0 registered, 195 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5