What a mess! [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-01-09 16:18 (4501 d 18:49 ago) – Posting: # 9802
Views: 12,385

Dear Detlew,

❝ ❝ ❝ … thus we can't empirical test it via simulations.

❝ ❝ Not sure what you mean here. :confused:


❝ I meant that simulations with θL ≤ 90% CI ≤ θU do not give substantial different results compared to θL < 90% CI < θU. Thus we can't choose that alternative which is closer to the analytical power calculation results…


Ah, now I understand! Theoretically (!) it would be possible if one goes with the R-package Rmpfr allowing for high numeric precision or Maxima and run a zillion of sim’s. Would need a supercomputer in the backyard.

❝ … (of course via PowerTOST :cool:).


What else? :-D
In my future sim’s of alpha (rounded CI) I will go for a ratio 0.80 instead of 1.25 since all three algos we have discussed give the same results there. Nevertheless, more studies than the 5% expected will pass making a significant result difficult to interpret.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
278 visitors (0 registered, 278 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5