What a mess! [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-01-09 11:33 (4553 d 05:19 ago) – Posting: # 9801
Views: 12,751

Dear Helmut,

❝ In my home-brew BE software I didn’t round at all, but tested for θL ≤ 90% CI ≤ θU.


Me too. From our sponsors perspective it's the better choice and if rounding comes into play it looks much better ;-). In that sense the R rounding is also a good choice.

❝ ❝ … thus we can't empirical test it via simulations.

❝ Not sure what you mean here. :confused:


I meant that simulations with θL ≤ 90% CI ≤ θU do not give substantial different results compared to θL < 90% CI < θU. Thus we can't choose that alternative which is closer to the analytical power calculation results (of course via PowerTOST :cool:).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,686 registered users;
33 visitors (1 registered, 32 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5