Rounding [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-01-05 21:13 (4505 d 09:27 ago) – Posting: # 9788
Views: 12,651

Dear Detlew!

❝ ❝ ... In the meantime I finished my balanced cross-over sim’s. n 12–60, CV 6–100%. With my grid I have 306·106 sim’s each. With rounding I got 24 (7.84%) empiric alphas significantly >0.05; without 11 (3.59%).


❝ How do you interpret the un-rounded results?


The jury is out. I ran two sim’s with identical seeds to compare the results. Nice intermediate result files (33.1MB unrounded, 14MB rounded). Have to find a clever way to filter for the suspects.

❝ Empirical evidence of an Alpha inflation of TOST :cool:?

❝ Hopefully not.


Don’t think so. On the other hand it puts occasional significant alphas I got in Methods B/C/D into perspective.

Sim’s are sim’s are sim’s.

It’s like with lab values. The more your physician requests, the more “*” you’ll get – though not being ill. ;-)

❝ Here I have another one:

round(c(1.2500499999999999, 1.250049999999999999), 4)

[1] 1.2500 1.2501


You are a nasty person.

❝ More trouble spots can be found in "The R inferno".

❝ Should be a must-read for all R-users.


Wow!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
223 visitors (0 registered, 223 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5