Imbalanced Xovers: α-inflation? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-12-28 15:37 (4130 d 22:25 ago) – Posting: # 9763
Views: 7,706

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ […] imbalance per se is not causing inflation of alpha in simple crossovers.


Do you know that or do you assume it?

❝ The phenomenon has not been studied or published for 2-stage designs, though.


Yep. Mdme Potvin:

“[…] each stage was assumed to be balanced with respect to sequence.”

Since I want to avoid troubles with regulators

“The imbalanced case is outside the validated framework. The applicant should justify that the consumers’s risk is preserved in the actual study.”

I recommend my clients to randomize the second stage in such a way that imbalance in the first stage is counteracted (e.g., stage 1 TR|RT 10|12, ntotal 32, stage 2 TR|RT 6|4).

❝ Did you mean to say something else?


I was just interested in common 2,2,2 cross-overs.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,655 registered users;
93 visitors (0 registered, 93 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5