Imbalanced Xovers: α-inflation? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-12-28 15:37 (4564 d 19:14 ago) – Posting: # 9763
Views: 8,902

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ […] imbalance per se is not causing inflation of alpha in simple crossovers.


Do you know that or do you assume it?

❝ The phenomenon has not been studied or published for 2-stage designs, though.


Yep. Mdme Potvin:

“[…] each stage was assumed to be balanced with respect to sequence.”

Since I want to avoid troubles with regulators

“The imbalanced case is outside the validated framework. The applicant should justify that the consumers’s risk is preserved in the actual study.”

I recommend my clients to randomize the second stage in such a way that imbalance in the first stage is counteracted (e.g., stage 1 TR|RT 10|12, ntotal 32, stage 2 TR|RT 6|4).

❝ Did you mean to say something else?


I was just interested in common 2,2,2 cross-overs.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,688 registered users;
58 visitors (0 registered, 58 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5