EMA: Veterinary (!) BE [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hi Querty!
Next time please state already in the first place what you are talking about. In the Vet. BE GL the stupid stuff from the human draft BE GL was copypasted 1:1. Obviously nobody commented on this nonsense (like on the BE draft). Now you have two options:
Next time please state already in the first place what you are talking about. In the Vet. BE GL the stupid stuff from the human draft BE GL was copypasted 1:1. Obviously nobody commented on this nonsense (like on the BE draft). Now you have two options:
- Switch off your brain, fire up SAS, and report all effects and their CIs as requested.
- State already in the protocol that you well aware of the GL, but refer also to the human GL – where this nonsensical requirement was removed. Search the forum for some background discussions in order to get some support in giving a justification (period effect, sequence effect, treatment effect). See also this oldie (slides 40–50).
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- EMEA CI on treatment, period & sequence effects qwerty12 2012-11-26 22:11 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- EMA: no CI on period & sequence effects Helmut 2012-11-26 22:39
- EMA: no CI on period & sequence effects qwerty12 2012-11-26 23:16
- EMA: Veterinary (!) BEHelmut 2012-11-26 23:59
- EMA: no CI on period & sequence effects qwerty12 2012-11-26 23:16
- EMA: no CI on period & sequence effects Helmut 2012-11-26 22:39