EMA: no CI on period & sequence effects [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-11-26 23:39 (4161 d 16:50 ago) – Posting: # 9595
Views: 3,220

Hi Qwerty!

❝ In the most recent EMEA guideline it asks for the "tests for difference and the respective confidence intervals for the treatment effect, the period effect, and the sequence effect should be reported as descriptive data."


No it doesn’t. You are referring to the draft GL (p.13, lines 512–514), back in 2008 when EMA was still called EMEA.

❝ What exactly does this mean?


Gibberish; except the CI of the treatment effect – that’s how we assess BE, right?

❝ How are they calculated? Can a SAS code be used to calculate the CIs on these effects.


If you are able to code SAS for BE (the CI of the treatment effect), ask politely for the CI of the others. But: The period effect does not influence the treatment effect anyway (means out), and the sequence effect (or unequal carry-over) cannot be handled properly in a 2×2 cross-over (confounded with treatment-by-period interaction). Therefore: forget it.

❝ I'm slightly confused as I thought that the confidence intervals for the difference in means between the two products to show bioequivalence would be the same as the CI for the treatment effect.


Right.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,665 registered users;
87 visitors (0 registered, 87 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5