Sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by The Outlaw Torn – Europe, 2012-11-22 11:55 (4501 d 13:15 ago) – Posting: # 9567
Views: 10,235

Goodmorning,

❝ Adding to what ElMaestro said my two cents: Maybe you can point out (in a polite way I’m not an expert in) that if one increases the sample size sooner or later any study will show a significant difference if the ratio is not exactly (!) 1. See this post. I don’t know your CV and sample size, but the sponsor cannot be blamed to have performed a study in “too” many subjects (I would avoid the term overpowered).


Just as a follow-up, would it be fair to twist a bit what you said and express it this way: "...that if one increases the sample size sooner or later any study will show a significant treatment difference if the ratio is not exactly one." Or is that too much wishful thinking?

The reason I'm asking is that the significant treatment effect is what seems to bother the assessor and not the fact that the ratio doesn't include unity (maybe both are linked statistically, but that's beyond my understanding).

Thank you.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,670 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:11 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5