Nice to know! [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-10-17 21:11 (4984 d 20:16 ago) – Posting: # 9430
Views: 9,089

Dear Detlew!

❝ ❝ Which design is the ‘best’? Pros & cons: [...]


❝ May be that the precision of CVwR is different between these designs if powered to the same value of stating BE.

❝ But in no guidance I know the precision of CVwR is an criterion. And we don't use it in any decision.


Yessir!

❝ So what? Nice to know?


Exactly – in the spirit of Bio-International ’94, where “Need to know vs. nice to know” was the unofficial slogan. Primarily I was interested whether it is worthwhile to go with TRT|RTR instead of the partial replicate because you get the bonus of CVWT. Some sponsors are interested how their formulation performs but the 4-period replicate has its drawbacks.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
109 visitors (1 registered, 108 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are no dangerous thoughts;
thinking itself is dangerous.    Hannah Arendt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5