One or two-tailed? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-09-17 11:57 (4677 d 06:55 ago) – Posting: # 9226
Views: 11,817

Dear Ol'Pirate,

❝ aren't both right?


The formula for the two-tailed CI is that given above (using a critical tvalue(1-alpha/2, df)).

The formula for the one-tailed interval (upper or lower) differs from that in using tval(1-alpha, df). This is the dual to the two one sided tests (TOST) procedure.

Using alpha=0.05 in the one-sided case both CIs are identical if using alpha=0.1 in the two-sided case. This is why it is said that the usual (two-sided) 90% CIs are operationally equivalent to the TOST procedure.

But in no case the critical value has to be derived with 1-2*alpha.

❝ Because of symmetry tval(1-alpha, df) = tval(1-alpha/2, df) if we are clear about the circumstances.

:confused:

❝ If I remember correctly MS Excel does it a little different from everyone else among the commonly used programs?


Lets take alpha=0.05, df=10, EXCEL 2010:
      1-alpha                         1-alpha/2
R     qt(0.95,10)     =1.8124611228  qt(0.975,10)   =2.228138852
SAS   tinv(0.95,10)   =1.8124611228  tinv(0.975,10) =2.228138852
EXCEL t.inv(0.95,10)  =1.812461123   t.inv(0.975,10)=2.228138852
but
EXCEL t.inv.2s(0.95,10)=0.064298146  t.inv.2s(0.975,10)=0.032130806  Kappes!
(Kappes = Kohl = cabbage = nonsense in the speech of the Ruhr district)
but
EXCEL t.inv.2s(0.1 ,10)=1.812461123  t.inv.2s(0.05,10)=2.228138852

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,697 registered users;
62 visitors (0 registered, 62 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority
is not using his intelligence;
he is just using his memory.    Leonardo da Vinci

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5