Two groups (e.g. logistics) [Design Issues]

posted by sangeeta – India, 2007-07-21 14:05 (6547 d 01:05 ago) – Posting: # 920
Views: 12,473

Thanks for all who gave me a great reply.,

The analysis model which i have taken:

Group, sequence, sequence*group, period*group, formulation and formulation*group interaction as fixed effects and subject nested within group*sequence as a random effect. Sequence, sequence*group and group were tested using the Type III mean-square term for subject nested within sequence*group as the error term, at a 10% level of significance.

The formulation, period*group and formulation*group effects were tested against the residual mean square error. Probability (p) values were derived from Type III sums of squares with 5% level of significance.

In this model which significant effects i should consider…

And If i get formulation*group interaction was statistically significant for one PK parameter so, what is the next step i have to take in this…? Will it effect on the BE criteria...?


Thanks in advance…

Sangeea

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
54 visitors (0 registered, 54 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Reach for the stars,
even if you have to stand on a cactus.    Susan Longacre

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5