Two groups (e.g. logistics) [Design Issues]

posted by sangeeta – India, 2007-07-21 14:05 (6898 d 13:56 ago) – Posting: # 920
Views: 13,844

Thanks for all who gave me a great reply.,

The analysis model which i have taken:

Group, sequence, sequence*group, period*group, formulation and formulation*group interaction as fixed effects and subject nested within group*sequence as a random effect. Sequence, sequence*group and group were tested using the Type III mean-square term for subject nested within sequence*group as the error term, at a 10% level of significance.

The formulation, period*group and formulation*group effects were tested against the residual mean square error. Probability (p) values were derived from Type III sums of squares with 5% level of significance.

In this model which significant effects i should consider…

And If i get formulation*group interaction was statistically significant for one PK parameter so, what is the next step i have to take in this…? Will it effect on the BE criteria...?


Thanks in advance…

Sangeea

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
117 visitors (0 registered, 117 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5