Division by 0.0566? [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-08-29 21:42 (4677 d 21:53 ago) – Posting: # 9126
Views: 7,573

Hi Risherd,

❝ I found out that WinNonlin estimate the F-value like this

Sequence effect

F-value = MS sequence / MS sequence*volunteer


❝ Using Bear data and applying the previous formula I obtain the same result of WinNonlin

F-value = 0.4585/0.105425 = 4.34.


Quick note: Looks to me like Bear in your case is diving the Seq MS with the residual coming from a model with just Seq? I am not sure how this value of 0.0566 entered the scene. The current standard, as far as I know, is to divide with the subject MS just like you describe (MS sequence*volunteer is the same as MS volunteer*sequence, which is the same as MS subject in sequence, which is the same as MS sequence in subject, although the latter is a cosmic mindf%&#er to interpret).

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5