Log in
RegisterFormulation Effect is irrelevant [General Statistics]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2012-07-28 15:42 (4657 d 22:44 ago) – Posting: # 8987
Views: 5,719
Dear Hiren!
Yes it is, though a significant formulation effect is irrelevant in BE (except in Denmark). If the CI does not include 100% one will always get a significant formulation effect.
❝ Is it possible that my T/R is 85 and significant formulation effect but variability in my study was so low that 90%CI came to 81-90.
Yes it is, though a significant formulation effect is irrelevant in BE (except in Denmark). If the CI does not include 100% one will always get a significant formulation effect.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Formulation Effect hiren379 2012-07-28 12:56 [General Statistics]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Formulation Effect is irrelevantHelmut 2012-07-28 13:42
- Formulation Effect is irrelevant hiren379 2012-07-28 13:49
- Statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant! Helmut 2012-07-28 16:23
- Statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant! hiren379 2012-08-14 14:51
- Statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant! Helmut 2012-07-28 16:23
- Formulation Effect is irrelevant hiren379 2012-07-28 13:49
- Formulation Effect is irrelevantHelmut 2012-07-28 13:42
Ing. Helmut Schütz