Powerless Potvin & Montague? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-07-05 18:11 (4310 d 11:05 ago) – Posting: # 8894
Views: 19,673

Dear Shuanghe, dear Helmut!

The whole thing you discuss here is a pure tragedy.
Such a lot of ignorance to scientific work and results is unbelievable :no:.
I'm at loss for words.

Regarding the intermediate power calculations:

Of course you can formulate the Potvin's decision scheme B without them.
But then it will happen that the sample size estimation step will give you a number which is smaller or at best equal to that you have already used for step 1.

Now what then?
Natural would be: STOP study. Bioequivalence not proven!
Exactly this is what the intermediate power calculation is for in scheme B.

I've heard some rumour from regulators that you should not stop but recruit 2 more subjects for stage 2 in that case. But this lacks any scientific justification IMHO.

Scheme C (D) is more complicated. At moment I don't have any idea if one can formulate it without intermediate power calculation. Seems a very integral part of that scheme.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,657 registered users;
57 visitors (0 registered, 57 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5