Two References [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-06-13 11:11 (4757 d 05:15 ago) – Posting: # 8724
Views: 9,731

Hi Helmut!

❝ Close to nil ...


What about
"In studies with more than two treatment arms (e.g. a three period study including two references, one from EU and another from USA, or a four period study including test and reference in fed and fasted states), the analysis for each comparison should be conducted excluding the data from the treatments that are not relevant for the comparison in question."
CPMP/QWP/EWP/1401/98 Rev. 1, page 14

May this eventually imply that in case of BE to the EU Reference but not to the USA Reference the study would pass?
IMHO this is one of the 'rationales' behind that crippled evaluation method that EU regulators are not interested in the BE result to the USA Reference.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5