Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Common variance!

Common variance! [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2012-06-12 15:22 (4757 d 21:39 ago) – Posting: # 8708
Views: 9,872

Hi HS,

❝ Are you still “within pharmacological reach”? If ev’rything fails consider a hint of Schützomycin. Happy dreams!

Thank you, good idea, I'll take a ton of them tablets. And perhaps I need a straitjacket also.

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Curiosity: Running BE studies with more than 2 arms jag009 2012-06-11 15:01 [Design Issues]
- Common variance! Helmut 2012-06-11 16:23
  - Common variance! jag009 2012-06-11 17:25
    - Common variance! Helmut 2012-06-11 17:35
      - Common variance! jag009 2012-06-11 20:03
        
        Common variance! ElMaestro 2012-06-11 20:34
        
        Common variance! Helmut 2012-06-12 01:03
        
        Common variance!ElMaestro 2012-06-12 13:22
  - Common variance! jag009 2012-06-12 19:56
    - What if I run a study with 2 references? jag009 2012-06-12 20:00
    - Common variance! Helmut 2012-06-12 20:39
      - Two References d_labes 2012-06-13 09:11
        
        Two References jag009 2012-09-10 22:48
        
        Two treatments only d_labes 2012-09-11 08:20
  - Common variance! jag009 2012-06-13 16:08

Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
54 visitors (0 registered, 54 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling. Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz