Common variance! [Design Issues]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2012-06-11 22:03 (4758 d 18:12 ago) – Posting: # 8687
Views: 9,881

Hi Helmut

:-D Everybody wants to kill two birds with one stone. What you essentially would need is a full adaptive design (adjusting for observed PEs and CVs). This is one of our member’s specialty. Acceptance? No idea.


I thought about adaptive design as well but then timing would become an issue since bioanalytical would be involved during the process? The stupid thing is we want to test all and hit the spot with one (hopefully). It is a resource (outsourcing) vs time issue.

I am the planner designer executioner (or whatever, not the one with the sickle), higher up gives the call (timeframe wise) :-|

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
56 visitors (0 registered, 56 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5