What for? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-04-28 05:12 (5157 d 22:05 ago) – Posting: # 8469
Views: 4,836

Hi Lindsay!

❝ Could post-hoc power analyses help in a pilot study with two test formulations compared to 1 reference in deciding which formulation to go forward with in a pivotal study?


No – what would you expect to gain? In any higher-order Xover (e.g., 3×3 Latin Squares, 6×3 Williams’ design) you get only a common estimate of the intra-subject variance. So it boils down to assessing the point estimates T1/R and T2/R. Select the one closer to 100%. Theoretically [sic] you could run a replicate design to assess the intra-subject variances of formulations as well. If the test/reference ratios are similar (or one is the reciprocal of the other) you could select the one with lower variability. But with two tests you will end up with a f**ing complicated replicate design with many periods, even if you a apply a modified Balaam’s design. Haven’t seen any such a study in 30+ years… ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
156 visitors (0 registered, 156 guests [including 69 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5