Useless power: over & over again [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-04-25 18:32 (5160 d 11:38 ago) – Posting: # 8462
Views: 4,978

Dear Mumbai! :-D

❝ Dear Vienna,

    ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑


❝ some time based on less power we are conduction two stage appraoch. but you said power calculations are futile why?


Two Stage studies can help in dealing with uncertain CVs – e.g., if you have only data from literature, old studies, or small pilot studies. The power calculation in the interim analysis is part of the decision tree; no post-hoc power calculation should be performed. What I said about conventional BE studies is applicable here as well: Either the study passed or not.
See also Potvin et al. (2008), Example 2, Method B:

[…] we obtain a two-sided CI for the ratio (T/R) of geometric means of 88.45—116.38%, which meets the 80—125% acceptance criterion. We stop here and conclude BE, irrespective of the fact that we have not yet achieved the desired power of 80% (power = 66.3%).

(my emphasis)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
139 visitors (0 registered, 139 guests [including 32 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5