actual time for INPUT, nominal for the summarisation/report [NCA / SHAM]

posted by SDavis Homepage – UK, 2012-04-17 15:35 (4811 d 14:44 ago) – Posting: # 8430
Views: 14,847

Hi - I just warning people of the simple assumptions that AUCall makes as illustrated in this image http://www.pharmpk.com/pk/AUCinf.jpg
[image]

Basically draws a straight line to the next SAMPLED point from Tlast.

SO if we look at the 3 profiles below, Subject 1 and 2 since they are either sampled to, or beyond 24 h, but subject 3 is not quantifiable after 12h. The redline I drew on here (12-24h) shoes how AUCall would be described and you can see that it could be quite different to an AUC24 that have been calculated by extrapolating.[image]

Note in the NCA results AUClast=AUCall for Subjects 1 & 2 where last sampled point was quantifiable.[image]

Simon.

Simon
Senior Scientific Trainer, Certara™
[link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX-yCO5Rzag[/link]
https://www.certarauniversity.com/dashboard
https://support.certara.com/forums/

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5