actual time for INPUT, nominal for the summarisation/report [NCA / SHAM]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-04-17 13:25 (4811 d 20:09 ago) – Posting: # 8427
Views: 13,630

Hi Simon,

❝ That's how I've always analysed my data over the last 15+years. Slightly more tricky is when protocol requests 0-72 and some samples were not quantifiable at that timepoint, again if you have a value for Lz this will be extrapolated for you but for profiles with no Lz then WNL will do it's best to extrapolate, effectively using AUCall (or a fraction thereof) with all the inherent assumptions and approximations of that metric. On these occasions I would be tempted to consider reporting an AUC to last COMMON timepoint e.g. 48.


Sounds very interesting. Could you explain what this means in practice? Can you give an example?

Many thanks.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
51 visitors (0 registered, 51 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5