Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Multiphasic MR ≠ DR

Multiphasic MR ≠ DR [BE/BA News]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2012-03-28 17:29 (4792 d 13:51 ago) – Posting: # 8341
Views: 22,136

Dear Helmut,

Do you think eventually FDA will impose the "biphasic" BE requirement for other methylphendiate MRs as well, like Metadate CD?

Thanks

John

Complete thread:

EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products Helmut 2012-03-06 15:23 [BE/BA News]
- EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products ElMaestro 2012-03-06 19:09
  - EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products Helmut 2012-03-07 03:52
    - EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products ElMaestro 2012-03-07 19:20
- EMA vs. FDA d_labes 2012-03-07 10:26
  - MPH examples Helmut 2012-03-07 14:22
    - MPH examples d_labes 2012-03-07 16:18
      - MPH examples Helmut 2012-03-08 01:07
        
        FDA more straight? d_labes 2012-03-08 08:29
        
        and what about power? ElMaestro 2012-03-08 11:37
        
        and what about power? d_labes 2012-03-08 13:26
        and what about power? Helmut 2012-03-08 13:36
        
        FDA more straight? Helmut 2012-03-08 12:51
        
        FDA more straight? luvblooms 2012-03-09 06:55
        
        Multiphasic MR ≠ DR Helmut 2012-03-09 12:18
        
        Multiphasic MR ≠ DRjag009 2012-03-28 15:29
        
        Metadate CD (30/70) Helmut 2012-03-28 15:45