To err is Julious [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-03-22 11:20 (4411 d 12:51 ago) – Posting: # 8312
Views: 6,173

Dear All!

In my previous post I have noticed that I could reproduce the power and sample size for non-inferiority trials only if I used
1-beta = 1 - pt(t1-alpha,n-2,df=n-2,tau)

Seems even the pope can err :-D.
The formulas given in the book


S.A. Julious
"Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials"
Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2010


are in error here, not only for the non-inferiority case (chapter 6) but also for the superiority tests (chapter 3/4).

Compare them to those in the paper


S.A. Julious
"TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS
Sample sizes for clinical trials with Normal data"

Statist. Med. 2004; 23: 1921-1986


where the formulas are yet given with power=1-probt(...).
Compare further the results of the normal approximation formulas
(f.i. formula 6.21 1-beta = pnorm(tau-t1-alpha,n-2)
to see that 1-probt(...) is correct.
With tau=2.5, df=7, alpha=0.05 (in R syntax):
(6.21) pnorm(2.5 - qt(1-0.05, df=7))       =0.72755
(6.22) pt(qt(1-0.05,df=7), df=7, 2.5)      =0.27283
       1 - pt(qt(1-0.05,df=7), df=7, 2.5)  =0.72717 q.e.d.


BTW: Would it desirable to have non-inferiority power / sample size in PowerTOST (although it is not based on TOST but on OOST :cool: - one one-sided t-test)? I could ask the author if he had some spare time :lol2:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,654 registered users;
103 visitors (0 registered, 103 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5