Some questions… [Off Topic]
Hei Pasi,
please see the Forum’s Policy.
Since you are affiliated with STAFINN and an adjunct professor of biostatistics are you up to answer some questions?
What’s this exactly? Are you essentially following these routines? Are you aware that for EMA
Automatically…
According to the website you are using ‘classical’ WinNonlin (BTW, which version?). Are you aware that in WinNonlin ≤v5.3 in the automatic method for estimation of λz Cmax/tmax may be included (based on max. R²adj)? This flaw was corrected in Phoenix/WinNonlin (all versions). Unbiased estimates of the elimination in a one-compartment model are obtained for timepoints ≥2× tmax. Which trapezoidal rule are you using? Hopefully lin-up/log-down – otherwise AUC will be positively biased if data points are missing in the profile. And so on and so forth…
Only IR formulations (you refer to CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 on your site)? What about MR products (CPMP/EWP/280/96) and the recent Q&A (see here)?
Which code are you using for replicate designs? Which method are you using in assessing outliers?
Don’t get me wrong, but what you call “the expert review of the pk calculations” in many cases would lead to doing almost the entire stuff manually anyhow. By ‘manually’ I mean setting the limits for λz and getting PK metrics which are not part of WinNonlin’s default output. Phoenix/WinNonlin’s (global) Cmin is definitely not what EMA wants to see (the concentration at τ). HVD and t75% are funny to setup in classical WinNonlin.
You make strong claims on your website. Fine.
please see the Forum’s Policy.
Since you are affiliated with STAFINN and an adjunct professor of biostatistics are you up to answer some questions?
❝ […] consistency etc checking is performed …
What’s this exactly? Are you essentially following these routines? Are you aware that for EMA
Proc MIXED
is of historical interest only (GL p15)? BTW, CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 ≠ ICH.❝ … data is derived ready for PK calculation which is performed automatically.
Automatically…

According to the website you are using ‘classical’ WinNonlin (BTW, which version?). Are you aware that in WinNonlin ≤v5.3 in the automatic method for estimation of λz Cmax/tmax may be included (based on max. R²adj)? This flaw was corrected in Phoenix/WinNonlin (all versions). Unbiased estimates of the elimination in a one-compartment model are obtained for timepoints ≥2× tmax. Which trapezoidal rule are you using? Hopefully lin-up/log-down – otherwise AUC will be positively biased if data points are missing in the profile. And so on and so forth…
❝ When the PK parameters are calculated (non compartmental calculation),…
Only IR formulations (you refer to CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 on your site)? What about MR products (CPMP/EWP/280/96) and the recent Q&A (see here)?
❝ the statistical analysis is performed
Which code are you using for replicate designs? Which method are you using in assessing outliers?
❝ One day, not much other manpower than the expert review of the pk calculations. Follows the EMA BE-study guidelines.
Don’t get me wrong, but what you call “the expert review of the pk calculations” in many cases would lead to doing almost the entire stuff manually anyhow. By ‘manually’ I mean setting the limits for λz and getting PK metrics which are not part of WinNonlin’s default output. Phoenix/WinNonlin’s (global) Cmin is definitely not what EMA wants to see (the concentration at τ). HVD and t75% are funny to setup in classical WinNonlin.
You make strong claims on your website. Fine.
If you tell me that you have a sheep in your garden, I will believe you.
If you tell me that you have a unicorn, I will go and see it.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Kodak went bankrupt; “Press the button!” is alive! Helmut 2012-03-02 14:01 [Off Topic]
- Another p-value generator? martin 2012-03-03 10:24
- Another p-value generator? Helmut 2012-03-03 11:36
- Holy crap, I love it ElMaestro 2012-03-03 12:25
- Holy crap, I fear it Helmut 2012-03-03 16:14
- Kodak went bankrupt; “Press the button!” is alive! pkorhonen 2012-03-07 20:14
- Some questions…Helmut 2012-03-08 15:12
- Another p-value generator? martin 2012-03-03 10:24