Benefit/risk [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-02-13 15:29 (5237 d 04:10 ago) – Posting: # 8119
Views: 6,348

Hi ElMaestro!

❝ Generally in statistics an alpha of 5% is considered appropriate. Whether this alpha level is appopriate or not is of course also a good question, but it has stuck for years and seems to be the tradition now.


<bean counting mode>

Not in statistics but in parts of science/engineering where variability is so high that the risk of going for larger sample sizes is considered to give no further benefit. In industry is the buzzword. :-D In the aerospace industry risk is often limited with 10–5 (the best we currently can achieve in software development) + redundant systems which pushes the risk of failure to at least 1:1010.

</bean counting mode>

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
115 visitors (0 registered, 115 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5