Log in
Register90% CI [General Statistics]
Hello Rana,
Generally in statistics an alpha of 5% is considered appropriate. Whether this alpha level is appopriate or not is of course also a good question, but it has stuck for years and seems to be the tradition now. When that alpha is applied in the equivalence world it implies a 90% CI (1-2*alpha, two-sided).
❝ Why only 90% Confidence Interval is being used in generally to prove bioequivalence..why can't 80% or 70% ??? What is rationale behind this?
Generally in statistics an alpha of 5% is considered appropriate. Whether this alpha level is appopriate or not is of course also a good question, but it has stuck for years and seems to be the tradition now. When that alpha is applied in the equivalence world it implies a 90% CI (1-2*alpha, two-sided).
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- 90% CI rana 2012-02-13 07:51 [General Statistics]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- 90% CIElMaestro 2012-02-13 08:07
- Benefit/risk Helmut 2012-02-13 14:29
- Benefit/risk ElMaestro 2012-02-13 14:35
- Benefit/risk Helmut 2012-02-13 14:42
- Lean + vendor oversight = no vendor oversight ElMaestro 2012-02-13 15:15
- Benefit/risk Helmut 2012-02-13 14:42
- Benefit/risk ElMaestro 2012-02-13 14:35
- Benefit/risk Helmut 2012-02-13 14:29
- Patient’s risk = 5% Helmut 2012-02-13 12:41
- 90% CIElMaestro 2012-02-13 08:07
Ing. Helmut Schütz