intrasubject [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-16 15:50 (5261 d 09:30 ago) – Posting: # 7950
Views: 6,470

Dear Karthik!

❝ they asked to calculate both intrasubject and intersubject CV.

❝ for intersubject they asked to calculate from art.mean and std dev.


OK, we had that before. That’s not correct, but calculate it according to their form anyhow.

❝ for intrasubject they given the statement like that

❝ according to the query 'the intrasubject variability in the reference literature is not consistent with your value'


I guess your CVintra is (much?) lower than the one given in literature? If pub­lished studies were not using an awful bioanalytical method (high CV) WHO might be suspicious that something went wrong in the study, e.g., conversion of a metabolite to the parent in the ion-source in LC/MS-MS. Since metabolites generally have lower CVs that the parent you will get a lower CV than with a method which separates parent & metabolites. Are your mean concentrations substantially higher than in the literature? If yes, get prepared for an inspection.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
131 visitors (0 registered, 131 guests [including 43 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5