THX & another request [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-13 14:31 (4868 d 02:23 ago) – Posting: # 7925
Views: 7,727

Dear Shuanghe!

❝ […] for full replicate data, I have same x, boundx and pointest values as yours but different values for other parameters […]


❝ Those values were calculated based on Dlat and we should have 73 Dlat values. If I understood your post, you have 69? But 69 is the number of Ilat. Don't know if this is the reason we have different result.


Thanks a lot! You guessed right – I filtered for complete data, but should have done differently for Ilat (n=69) and Dlat (n=73). Now I could reproduce your results in Phoenix:
s2wr       0.19931360
y         -0.15879089
sWR        0.44644551
boundy    -0.12298597
critbound -0.09207634

Since sWR ≥ 0.294 apply scaled ABE:
a. -0.09207634 ≤ 0 &
b. 0.80 ≤ 1.1546 ≤ 1.25
Scaled Average BE shown (CVWR 46.96%)

Would you be so kind and check my results for an incomplete partial replicate design as well? I removed period 3 (R) of subject 24 in data set II, and got:

pointest   1.0302521
x          0.00001265951
boundx     0.0065348721
s2wr       0.01032549
y         -0.00822620
sWR        0.10161441
boundy    -0.0052378774
critbound -0.0010393276

Since sWR < 0.294 apply unscaled ABE:
unscabe_pointest 1.0291
unscabe_lower    0.9775
unscabe_upper    1.0833

0.80 ≤ 0.9775 & 1.0833 ≤ 1.25
Average BE shown (CVWR 10.33%)


Thank you in advance!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5