CHMP PKWP Doc: recode of Period required? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by randombadger – UK, 2011-11-28 19:45 (5325 d 14:19 ago) – Posting: # 7742
Views: 6,502

Hi,

For higher order studies (i.e. 3x3, 4x4 etc) I understand that the PKWP want us to make comparisons using a data subset (e.g. T2 vs T1) excluding the data from the treatments that are not relevant for the comparison in question (e.g. T1).

So, the analysis done is basically a 2-way crossover study for each treatment comparison.

However, how are the the order of treatments incorporated into the statistical model? Are the actual periods ignored hence recoded e.g. for the comparison between R and T2 for a subject assigned to R|T1|T2 treatment sequence, is Period 1 data regarded as “period 1” data and Period 3 data regarded as “period 2” data in the analysis or can the original Period be used in the model?

Thanks!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
358 visitors (0 registered, 358 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5