Another Oops. [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-11-25 15:23 (5329 d 04:03 ago) – Posting: # 7724
Views: 10,387

Dear Detlew!

❝ Inspecting it I have some doubts:

❝ ❝ […] some nonsense code


❝ Must the EMA guidance interpreted in this way, i.e. analysing the dataset with 'pseudo' periods and sequences? Or should it interpreted the way which is employed in the Q&A for the replicate design (intra-subject variability of the reference). That means only massacre out the data concerning R2 but retaining the original periods and sequences. :ponder:


Exactly! Should forget copypasting old code when new ‘knowledge’ became available in the meantime. :-(

❝ ❝ FMMSE     <- summary(FullModel)$sigma^2/FMdf

❝ At least the code for FMMSE has stolen my sleep :confused:. According to the help page of lm.summary() "... sigma - the square root of the estimated variance of the random error" and IMHO then the MSE is sigma^2 without the division by the degrees of freedom!


Oh s**t!

❝ Check this out via anova(FullModel)["Residuals","Mean Sq"]==summary(FullModel)$sigma^2 .

❝ Or did I miss sumfink here?


No, no. Sorry!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
359 visitors (0 registered, 359 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5