Dose proportionality and BE [Design Issues]

posted by sciguy – Canada, 2011-11-04 20:18 (5348 d 11:44 ago) – Posting: # 7612
Views: 9,924

Hi Helmut,

❝ If you get a CI within 80–125% after 10 mg compare to 8 mg without dose-correction f is lower, right? It might be possible that (e.g. with an MR compared to an IR) you partly miss the absorption window of the drug. f will be lower.


You're right - I meant if f and clearance are different than it wouldn't be appropriate to dose normalize. In a properly designed study, it would seem unlikely clearance would be much different though since the strengths are similar.
Thanks for your input!

sciguy

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
373 visitors (0 registered, 373 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5