Dose proportionality and BE [Design Issues]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2011-11-04 11:19 (4930 d 18:16 ago) – Posting: # 7604
Views: 7,886

Dear Helmut and Sciguy,

I just noted this in a Q&A on the CMDh web site. See question 8a, on the situation when the relevant strength of the reference product is no longer marketed:

In general the cumulative strength of the reference product should be the same as the strength that the applicant has applied for, thus maintaining the direct link with the reference product. However it may be justified to use different strengths when pharmacokinetics are linear and a potency correction is performed. This would apply if the different strengths or pharmaceutical forms of the reference product are part of the same Global Marketing Authorisation and the general biowaiver criteria as outlined in section 4.1.6 of the Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Rev.1/Corr**) should be met for the test product when relevant. The acceptability of using a different strength or pharmaceutical form of the reference medicinal product should also be discussed with the competent authority of the country where the reference product is authorised.

To summarise: it may be acceptable, but ask for scientific advice first :-D

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

My doctor gave me six months to live,
but when I couldn’t pay the bill
he gave me six months more.    Walter Matthau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5