PHX/WNL vs. SAS [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-10-08 04:21 (4961 d 02:45 ago) – Posting: # 7449
Views: 14,068

Comrades!

❝ ❝ The SE and 90%CI for R and T are not equal within WNL and SAS, which will be reliable? (Even for equal sequences data)


❝ Wow! That's curious.


Mistery solved (?) after this post.

If you want to get in PHX/WNL the same LSMs/SE/CIs of treatments as in SAS you have to set all effects fixed.

Maybe you can try SAS’ Proc MIXED instead of Proc GLM and tweak it in order to give you LSMEANS similar to PHX/WNL.
But I’m not equipped with [image]

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
229 visitors (0 registered, 229 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5