LS Means mean? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-10-05 14:45 (4963 d 15:08 ago) – Posting: # 7426
Views: 14,362

Dear yicaoting!

❝ Both WNL and SAS give us the same SE for R and T, why?

I as a bloody statistical layperson can't explain with understandable words what LSMeans really are. Try to :google: 'standard error least square means' OR 'lsmeans standard error' and hope to find an explanation which satisfies you.
I myself have accepted this as a fact within the 2x2 crossover design evaluation without really understanding the 'Why'.
Since the term 'Least square mean' is ascribed to [image][image] this is a hornets' nest similar to the 'Type III Sum of squares'.

❝ The SE and 90%CI for R and T are not equal within WNL and SAS, which will be reliable? (Even for equal sequences data)


Wow! That's curious.
But it does not matter too much because we are not interested in the LSMeans itself but in the treatment difference (in the log-transformed domain) and the 90% CI for that.
As long as these results are identical all is right with the world I think :cool:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
266 visitors (0 registered, 266 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5