Weighted Means? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-10-05 03:53 (4964 d 02:39 ago) – Posting: # 7425
Views: 14,390

Dear Pankaj,

personally I have great sympathy for your procedure (suggesting a weighted mean). With yicaoting’s data of formulation 1 we would get:

(238.92·7 + 231.38·9)/(7+9) = 234.68

Unfortunately both SAS and Phoenix/WinNonlin report only the LSM (238.92 + 231.38)/2 = 235.15 (which is required in many guidelines). No big deal if sequences are not too unbalanced.
I think your suggestion is reasonable but you open a can of worms (see also this post and ElMaestro’s reply).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
100 visitors (0 registered, 100 guests [including 37 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5