Weighted Means? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-10-05 03:53 (5382 d 21:02 ago) – Posting: # 7425
Views: 16,783

Dear Pankaj,

personally I have great sympathy for your procedure (suggesting a weighted mean). With yicaoting’s data of formulation 1 we would get:

(238.92·7 + 231.38·9)/(7+9) = 234.68

Unfortunately both SAS and Phoenix/WinNonlin report only the LSM (238.92 + 231.38)/2 = 235.15 (which is required in many guidelines). No big deal if sequences are not too unbalanced.
I think your suggestion is reasonable but you open a can of worms (see also this post and ElMaestro’s reply).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
201 visitors (0 registered, 201 guests [including 43 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5