Weighted Means? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-10-05 03:53 (5379 d 23:23 ago) – Posting: # 7425
Views: 16,698

Dear Pankaj,

personally I have great sympathy for your procedure (suggesting a weighted mean). With yicaoting’s data of formulation 1 we would get:

(238.92·7 + 231.38·9)/(7+9) = 234.68

Unfortunately both SAS and Phoenix/WinNonlin report only the LSM (238.92 + 231.38)/2 = 235.15 (which is required in many guidelines). No big deal if sequences are not too unbalanced.
I think your suggestion is reasonable but you open a can of worms (see also this post and ElMaestro’s reply).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
344 visitors (0 registered, 344 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5