Statistical Issue (significant Formulation, Period and seq.) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by usfda_emea – 2007-05-05 11:12 (6990 d 12:12 ago) – Posting: # 714
Views: 13,582

Dear IMRAN,

❝ In Bioequivalence study, if formulation (Treatment) effect is significant (since ANOVA p-value is less than 0.05) for both Cmax and AUC and individually for Cmax or AUC, what we can conclude from this significant formulation effect.


Assuming that the bioequivalence is observed, inspite of significant difference in treatment effect for ANOVA, it can be inferred that the formulations are different but bioequivalent.

❝ Similarly, what we can conclude from period and sequence significant effect.


A significant period effect could reflect on following causes:Opinions only, with no binding.
USFDA_EMEA. ;-)

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
231 visitors (0 registered, 231 guests [including 129 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5