Statistical Issue (significant Formulation, Period and seq.) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by usfda_emea – 2007-05-05 11:12 (6583 d 19:16 ago) – Posting: # 714
Views: 12,358

Dear IMRAN,

❝ In Bioequivalence study, if formulation (Treatment) effect is significant (since ANOVA p-value is less than 0.05) for both Cmax and AUC and individually for Cmax or AUC, what we can conclude from this significant formulation effect.


Assuming that the bioequivalence is observed, inspite of significant difference in treatment effect for ANOVA, it can be inferred that the formulations are different but bioequivalent.

❝ Similarly, what we can conclude from period and sequence significant effect.


A significant period effect could reflect on following causes:Opinions only, with no binding.
USFDA_EMEA. ;-)

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
140 visitors (0 registered, 140 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current.    Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5